Message 765 of 3544

ARE BUSH & McCAIN RIGHT?



Republican Sen. John McCain used the Iraqi province to show how off-base he thinks Democratic rival Sen. Barack Obama was in his initial opposition to last year's surge, which saw the infusion of 30,000 additional U.S. troops into the war. McCain pointed out that Anbar, once among the deadliest places in Iraq, was greatly improved, with Al Qaeda in Iraq mostly driven from the sprawling western governorate.

Anbar is not exactly a poster province for tranquility.

(continued in 1st reply)
photo of LifeLoveLaughter

The day before he spoke, Iraqi authorities declared a security alert and imposed a curfew in Fallujah, a major provincial city and site of some of the war's heaviest fighting just months ago. Fallujah police chief Abdul-Kareem al-Dulaimi says the measure was taken because of recent incidents in the city, including a suicide bombing that killed 15 people and injured at least 17 at a tribal gathering. That attack followed months of calm in Anbar. "We also aimed at limiting the movements of the armed groups on the outskirts of Fallujah who plan to give support to other armed groups inside," he adds.

Anbar has been trumpeted since tribal Sunni militias turned against Al Qaeda in 2006 and appeared to have helped neutralize the terrorist network. But political rifts among the remaining Sunnis appear to be growing more disruptive. The tribal forces are in a bitter power struggle with the establishment Sunni leaders who were elected to key posts back when most Sunnis still boycotted the vote. Recently, the two factions have been feuding over who should be the provincial police chief. U.S. troops had planned to officially turn over security leadership in the mostly Sunni province to Iraqi troops in a ceremony on June 27, but canceled, with the military saying dust storms were going to interfere with travel to the event.

But since then, several Anbar figures have disputed whether the handover, which has occurred in 10 out of 18 provinces so far, should go forward just yet. Tribal leader Ali Hatem al-Suleiman told NEWSWEEK earlier this month that local forces were not strong enough or sufficiently organized to do the job. Though the weather cleared weeks ago, the handover still has not occurred.

As the surge ended this week, leaving 150,000 Americans troops still in Iraq, much of the country has been quiet. U.S. military officials say that nationwide, attacks are at their lowest level since March 2004, declining 80 percent since the surge began in June 2007. In Baghdad, attacks have returned to February 2008 levels after a spike in the intervening months, says Major Gen. Michael D. Jones, of the Directorate of Interior Affairs, which advises the Ministry of Interior. "They're currently at levels that I didn't dream we'd be at here in Baghdad," he says. He did not have specific numbers.

Current Anbar police chief Gen. Tariq Yousif, who is backed by tribal leaders, says the province is in much better shape now, with the Baghdad-Damascus and Baghdad-Amman highways (highly dangerous arteries a few months ago) safe, and open 24 hours. He insists the handover was postponed because of bad weather and adds, "I think we will do it this month, for we are completely ready to deal with the security in a good way by ourselves, without any help from the Americans, except consultations."

The Fallujah curfew was lifted after less than 24 hours. "[Al] Qaeda now has nothing to do but suicide operations and cannot face the Iraqi police," says Yousif.

But with at least 30 people killed in the city in recent weeks and signs of restiveness appearing in other parts of the province, "Anbar" may still be more of a cautionary tale for the U.S. military than a success story to be cited in America's presidential campaign.

view link

photo of LifeLoveLaughter

2 months ago
when has bush or mcaain ever been right ??
photo of thefrenchinhaler

2 months ago
There have been several very deadly attacks just this week, the violence seems to be going up. Even though we keep hearing that the "surge" is over, there are still about 20,0000 more troops in Iraq than before the "surge", which was actually an escalation and we all know it.

While violence overall is down, there has been little progress in the actual governance within Iraq. There is no policy to disbtribute the oil wealth, and not everyone is participating within the government. They want us out, so they can get on with their little civil war -- something that will continue whether we stay sixteen months or one hundred years.
photo of torry49

2 months ago
When Bush was pushing for the FTA with Colombia a similar technique was used. They showed the city of Medellin and how much it had changed. And indeed it has changed much for the better. But they forget to tell you that operations for the narco terrorists just moved. Crime in Buena Ventura as well as other places went up by massive amounts.

It is nothing more than a PR trick. And get ready for BS from Bush friendly media reporting about the progress in Iraq.
photo of colgringo

2 months ago
Anyone who has any common sence know's Bush and McCain are lying . But they have the mass of the Rep's fooled . Not sure how they do it ; when they feel they are so much smarter . All I know is we don't need McCain to get in and make things worse .
photo of deltadog

2 months ago
If this thing is working, please tell me why WE are still paying the bills? Maliki and his ilk are lining their pockets, the infraastructure in Iraq is still a mess, and we're paying all the bills. There is no cohesive government. It's all BS.

I don't know about you, but when I'm a guest in someone's home, and I get an indication they are ready for me to live, I'm out the door.
photo of torry49

2 months ago
It is suprising that McCain had a lucid enough moment to get this shot in even though it is not true. On the heels of this lie came another one stating the so-called "surge" was McCain's idea. I guess one good lie deserves another.
photo of havemercy

2 months ago
The McCain/Bush story is that the Iraq War became less violent because more American troops were sent to Iraq. The logic is "war going badly" + "more troops" = "war going well". That, of course, isn't the real story.

1) America converted the Iraqi insurgents into a paid American militia

2) Ethnic cleansing in Iraq finished it's task

3) Iraqi's turned against Al Qaeda's foreigners.

4) The American's increased presence dampened the remaining flames in and around Bagdad.

The third point is a real plus for stability in Iraq. But the second and first points set Iraq up for likely future civil war. And the last point is already decreasing in importance.

But if the false message "The Surge won the war" is allowed to stand, then a large part of this nation's voters may believe that it is true.

Obama is the person who needs to articulate the reality of Iraq to the American people. That's his job now.
photo of SchoolBoy

2 months ago