Message 772 of 3543

Here's the scoop:


Three big things happened on Iraq this week. They could mean the beginning of the end of the war.

Iraqis want U.S. Troops out.
No one was expecting Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to speak up in favor of withdrawal-after all, he's close with the Bush administration. But with elections in Iraq coming up, and a great majority of Iraqis opposed to a prolonged U.S. occupation, Maliki can't afford to toe the Bush line. So he's surprised everyone by standing up this week for a timetable for troop withdrawals and a date certain to end the war. The LA Times headline reads, "Iraqi prime minister advocates withdrawal timeline."

As a result, the "endless war agreement" Bush has been pushing fell through.
Since January, hundreds of thousands of us pushed Congress to stand up to President Bush's proposed treaty with Iraq, which would have tied the next President's hands and made it much harder to get out. This week, the Washington Post reported that that agreement has fallen through-Iraqi leaders are putting their feet down and demanding a much shorter agreement.

And now even the Pentagon is considering faster timelines.
According to reporter Michael Hirsh at Newsweek, "a forthcoming Pentagon-sponsored report" will recommend a big drawdown of troops-suggesting "that U.S. forces be reduced to as few as 50,000 by the spring of 2009, down from about 150,000 now."

photo of LifeLoveLaughter
Replies 1 - 10 of 13
In other words, it's now clear: Most Americans are for a timeline, and so are most Iraqis. And even experts in the Pentagon agree.

For his part, Barack Obama is using these developments to hammer home the point that John McCain and President Bush are now isolated in their resistance to any kind of timeline for withdrawal. He wrote an Op-Ed in the New York Times yesterday that reaffirmed his commitment to a timeline that would have all combat troops out of Iraq in 16 months.

It concludes, "Unlike Senator McCain, I would make it absolutely clear that we seek no presence in Iraq similar to our permanent bases in South Korea. . . [F]or far too long, those responsible for the greatest strategic blunder in the recent history of American foreign policy have ignored useful debate in favor of making false charges about flip-flops and surrender. It's not going to work this time. It's time to end this war."

photo of LifeLoveLaughter

2 months ago
Do you links for your 3 points? I'm especially interested in #'s 1 & 2.

I have a private take on this. The al-Maliki coolition expects to crush Shia opposition through military means. Then removing the Americans allows the Shia government to crush America's Sunni militia. Lastly, with their protectors (the Americans) gone and surrounded by hostile governments, the Kurds can be reigned in.

Iraq will then just be another autocratic/theocratic regime in the Middle East. I just don't see any evidence of any social organizations taking root in Iraq other than those that perpetuate the current government in power.
photo of SchoolBoy

2 months ago
Whether we stay two years, or one hundred years, the end will be the same a radical theocracy.
photo of torry49

2 months ago
at the end of the day when we leave, iraq will run their house the way they see fit acording to their beliefs and morals .. not ours .. we can't just give them our constitution and expect them to enact it, enforce it, understand it , or respect it like we do .. they are not americans and have no clue what it's like to be an american just as we and especially this administration have no idea what it's like to be an iraqi .. it's a completely different world over there .. and the sooner we recognize this fact the better it will go for all concerned .. frenchy..
photo of thefrenchinhaler

2 months ago
Talk about "flip flops" now mccain is talking about sending troops from Iraq to Afghanistan. the new "surge". I agree with this, however, pretty confusing. We can't draw down the troops in Iraq...oops, never mind...we can. Wow.
photo of wovoka

2 months ago
photo of LifeLoveLaughter

2 months ago
Obama's last few words is "time to end this war". Shouldn't it be read as, it's time to get the U.S. out of this war by cutting and running and/or surrender. I don't think that we should listen to the sayings of Ayatolla Fadallah from Lebanon, that geat bastion of stability and common sense. I wasn't a particular fan of Ayatolla Kockamame of Iran either. They are not on my side. Iraq will vote in October and that is a good sign. I believe that they will vote because of our presence, not the absence of it. If only we in the U.S. could get most of our people intereted in voting.
photo of wayin

2 months ago
Both Obama and McCain are “flip flopping” on the war, but Obama supporters will only point to McCain as “flip flopping” and McCain supporters will only point to Obama as “flip flopping.”, which tells me that few Americans have a balanced perspective on this issue.

The fact is the war in Iraq may turn out to be the second longest, or maybe even the longest, shooting war, right behind Vietnam, that America has ever engaged in, and the mission has already changed many times, and in my opinion, it will continue to change well into the future.

It appears to me that Iraq is destined to become very close allies with Iran, and I agree with Torry49; “Whether we stay two years, or one hundred years, the end will be the same a radical theocracy.” My position has always been that we should have focused more heavily on the war in Afghanistan and never invaded Iraq. Invading Iraq was/is one of the biggest foreign policy disasters America has ever engaged in, and it was done solely to satisfy the ego of President George W, Bush.

There are pros and cons to us withdrawing from Iraq, just as there are pros and cons about us withdrawing from Afghanistan; and all sorts of scenarios may develop if we withdraw from either; both Iraq and Afghanistan are Muslim nations which lean towards a theocracy, although Afghanistan is predominately Sunni and Iraq is redolently Shia. Next we will be discussing when and how we should withdraw from Afghanistan; what’s the American military mission in Afghanistan, and I would bet that it will change over time just like the mission in Iraq has changed. And I also think that there will come a day when the Afghan people, and maybe even a future Afghan government, will ask America to leave Afghanistan. But like Iraq, who we have given billions of dollars, we are also giving a lot of money to Afghanistan.

I repeat what I said in another post; America will be at war for sometime to come regardless who is elected president, and now that we have invaded Iraq, wasted precious U.S. resources there, and have been there for some time now; what's the difference between the war in Iraq and the war in Afghanistan; especially if the mission keeps changing? Yes I know that the war in Afghanistan is more justified by lots of Americans than the war in Iraq, but war is war and will withdrawing troops from Iraq and not Afghanistan give us any more peace? When we say “bring the troops home from Iraq ” we should understand that the troops will not be coming home from Iraq, rather they will be transferred to Afghanistan, and it does seem like that will make some Americans feel a lot better.

photo of EZ2

2 months ago
Cut and run?

72% of U.S. Troops Want Out of Iraq Within One Year» view link

Less than half of Americans think U.S. can win in Iraq view link

63% want all troops home by end of '08 view link

photo of LifeLoveLaughter

2 months ago
My prediction is that the war in Afghanistan will become much more of a headache for the U.S. than the war in Iraq. Remember what Afghanistan did to the former Soviet Union. Here we are talking about Iraq like Afghanistan does not matter; by the end of 2008 Afghanistan will probably replace Iraq as a dominant issue in the minds of Americans.

photo of EZ2

2 months ago
Replies 1 - 10 of 13