groups

Gee…, which is worse a president, with not enough morals to keep his pants zipped up?
Or
One who has sent thousands of Americans to die in an illegal war killing tens of thousands of privet citizens’ who would have done us no harm if we had left them alone????

Hmmmm??? If one hand not bankrupted the U.S. and destroyed the U.S. economy at the same time, while the other restored it to the best state of health it had been in twenty years. That might be a hard choice.

I think back to the late 1970’s early 80’s during the Jimmy Carter administration and they rode him mercilessly just because he had a brother named Billy… Yet, 30 years later these same people, republicans put a carbon copy of the man, Billy Carter they ridiculed in the white house for 8 years…

I’m not a fan of Bill Clinton; I hope Hillary does not get elected… But I will take a Rhoads scholar over an alcoholic, drug addict any day of the week…..

I think Bush will be the first president to ever leave office in which the “World” will celebrate and throw a big party over the fact he is out of office…

Simple answer....neither one. It's not a fair question. Both are criminals. LOL!

And are you referring to Hillary or Bill Clinton? Not that it matters
much.

Bill Clinton, any day.

NEITHER!
But at least Bill Clinton gave the "appearance" of proficiency.
I felt that he knew what he was doing-- a Rhodes (sp?) Scholar, afterall
(just like Kris Kristofferson, my hero)

Clinton; him or her

not that it matters much but, "Bill (I can't keep my pants zipped up) Clinton"

Which Clinton, and which Bush ???

FW

I'm not saying it's RIGHT, but I'll betcha lotsa money that Bill Clinton isn't the first, nor will he be the last president to have a little zipper trouble. He just got caught.

I would speculate that there are plenty of them to go around, regardless of political affiliation or sexual preference.

Just to be fair with everyone here, I did this whole post here, to prove my point on the “Free Speech” blog that they have made the term “Free Speech” into an oxymoron.

There you are free to speak your mind as long as you do not speak out against G.W. Bush or the Republican Party. If you do you will be deleted (as were my initial comments… and I mean immediately…. Deleted) or you will be personally, belittled and attacked. You can go there and see for your self. An exceptionally poor example of free speech, there.

I get the feeling I know what it means to have been black and living in the south in the 1960’s. They were free alright….

Enjoy the post and speak freely (just don't attack people when you do. Take exception with the idea being put forth).

This is a good way to couch this question. Clinton or Bush....not, do you approve/disapprove of Clinton or Bush.

This is the kind of choice politics presents us.

Given the choice - Bush. No Question. (It doesn't matter if we speak of Bush1, Bush2, Mr or Mrs Clinton)