Message 2227 of 2452

A New World Paradigm

Discussions often devolve into a polarized manner because in this medium , it isn't the easiest to convey ideas accurately. It is easier for the mind to juggle between either/or than to keep track of a lists of the inbetweens.
One of these polarizations run along the line of Capitalist vs Communist.
What if we could develop a new world paradigm that could improve on the failings of capitalism and communism? As I would think that the most avid supporter of each could admit that each are not perfect.

I am going to go right ahead and give my views in the next box, as this thread is a continuation from a diversion that began in "Gas and Electric".
photo of moonie368
58 Replies
1 2 ... 12 Next »
I look forward to this discussion, EXCELLENT TOPIC!

KUDOS

11 months ago
Ah....there in lays the rub. Each declaring that they are the picture of perfection, and all would be well when the other one realized that, got off their high horse and joined them. How about calling it Humanism?
photo of jamryn

11 months ago
Guidelines toward a new world paradigm

1. Unity of mankind
2. Gender Equality
3. Elimination of all forms of prejudice
4. World peace
5. Harmony of religion and science
6.Independent investigation of truth
7.Universal compulsory education
8.Universal auxiliary language
9.Obedience to government and non-involvement in partisan politics
10. Elimination of extremes of wealth and poverty.

The above are taken from 12 principles that are frequently listed as a quick summary of the Bahá'í teachings. They are derived from transcripts of speeches given by `Abdu'l-Bahá during his tour of Europe and North America in 1912. The original list is not authoritative and a variety of such lists circulate. The faith itself began in 1844 and started in Iran. Other faiths and governments perhaps already support such notions in theory, but I was able to hear them clearly from the Baha'i perspective. We are all human and fall short of ideals, but it is no reason to give up, We just need the persistence to work towards them.

I have eliminated the 1st 2 principles of the Baha'i 12 which are unity of God and unity of religion, because I am not here to advertise the Baha'i Faith or support religion, but feel that its principles are a good backbone in which to develop a world paradigm and the following can be done including those who wish to do so from a purely humanistic endeavor. Actually that is what they are for - to develop a new world paradigm, just as Jesus came to prepare the world for changes to be brought about by the Roman Empire, these are issues that we need to address to prepare the world for the inevitable changes that are occurring now. If you look at the UN agenda you will find that efforts are being made in these directions- however imperfect they may be.

In addition to the above, all humankind has the right to safe housing, drinking water, basic healthcare and freedom from fear of aggressors - that is taken adlib from our global UN rights (and I probablt left much out).

For any action taken by ourselves we need to try to insure that the basic principles and basic rights of humans are not or only minimally compromised.

photo of moonie368

11 months ago
Jamryn,
Please discuss further.
photo of moonie368

11 months ago
I have contended for decades that to assume there are only two possible economic systems available to the human race was inane. Certainly we are more creative than that!

Great topic!!

Certainly the list you gave is utopian, or at least idealistic in the extreme, but worth examining.

Some of the issues I'd like to address: First, world peace. Fine, but you're always going to have to have some way for us men-types at least to drain off our instinctive aggressions and competitiveness: Maybe international sports or other competitions.

"Independent investigation of truth" is just way too vague to have any real meaning. How to you establish "independent". . .and who's "truth?". . .mine, or yours?

"Universal compulsory education." Boy, as a teacher, this one scares me to death!!!
I have very grave doubts about formal education in general, and I have especially grave doubts about governmental control of education.

"Obedience to government." Never. . .not this kid: At least not blind obedience.

Herein lies the problem: To create a new paradigm, you have to find one that everyone can agree on. Good luck on that!!

Nonetheless, discussions like this are the best kind. . .gets everyone at least discussing and thinking.


11 months ago
58 Replies
1 2 ... 12 Next »