Message 120 of 6485

The Monster in the Box

Yesterday I returned this book, unfinished, to the library. I was reall disappointed, usually I love Ruth Rendel's Inspector Wexford books, but this one just didn't grab me at all. It kept going back and forth between an incident maybe 20 years ago or more, to the present day, and although it seemed to be trying to get the reader fascinated with a sinisterly written bad guy, it just didn't work for me. Neither did the parts of that talking about Wexford as a young man. Yawn.....

The good news is that I'm now reading Deborah Crombie's latest, Necessary as Blood and finding it very good. The only downside so far is that her last book was out so long ago, in my time frame, that I'm having some trouble remembering it, and she's using characters from it, and what happened then, as references in the current book. Uh, Deborah, lots of us just don't remember that far back... rotflmao Seriously, though, I'm liking it a lot so far.
barbincolorado's profile
That's why I so often have to go back & read the previous book in a series before starting the new one!! Especially for those authors who space their books out so far. Maybe they need to start putting a preface in that would read like the old-time radio show series - "when last we left our intrepid heroine, she was left tied to the railroad track by Dirt Dastardly".
As you say Barb - some of our memories....
tnbopeep's profile

about 1 month ago
That's a great idea BoPeep. It certainly would help when you read a book out of sequence.
JanetYas's profile

about 1 month ago
Definitely a good idea, bopeep, I mean, really! What are they thinking? :x
barbincolorado's profile

about 1 month ago