Not to change the subject....
.....but I am gathering information and opinions on the Electoral College (helping a certain favorite student do some research for a paper). Do you think the Electoral College an antiquated relic or does it actually reinforce the themes of the constitution? Is its endurance the only thing that protects us from popular vote/mob rule mentality? If we went to the popular vote, what would prevent wholesale vote buying? How would anyone not from a densely populated area ever get elected? How would we guard against small, special interest groups (again from densely populated areas) stealing elections?
I thought I was against the Electoral College, but now, having delved further into the subject, I see the wisdom of the institution. I also think that eliminating the Electoral College would have to entail further changes (senate, house, etc.)to the constitution. Flawed as it may seem (ie: why can't a state's popular vote be reflected in the Electoral college as opposed to the all or nothing system now in place), I think the Electoral College may be the (far) lesser of the evils than whatever would be devised to replace it. (Can you imagine the implications of voting machine corruption and hanging chads if national elections were dependent on popular votes?)
Any thoughts?
I thought I was against the Electoral College, but now, having delved further into the subject, I see the wisdom of the institution. I also think that eliminating the Electoral College would have to entail further changes (senate, house, etc.)to the constitution. Flawed as it may seem (ie: why can't a state's popular vote be reflected in the Electoral college as opposed to the all or nothing system now in place), I think the Electoral College may be the (far) lesser of the evils than whatever would be devised to replace it. (Can you imagine the implications of voting machine corruption and hanging chads if national elections were dependent on popular votes?)
Any thoughts?
posted
by SherriP




