Message 68 of 2734

RELIGION

Something I frequently run across in dating when it comes to people describing themselves is that they are "spiritual but not religious". In practical terms just what does that mean? Could a relationship between a "spiritual" and a "religious" person ever work out or is it doomed to conflict? What are your thoughts on this?
moondancerinred's profile
Not really sure about the difference in the 2 terms, but in my own mind I think people who are "spiritual" don't go to a specific church or practice a specific faith, where people who are "religious" go to church or temple regularly. That's just what I think when I hear those descriptions, but I'd be interested to hear what others think. I've had the same wonder as you about it.
djmhart's profile

about 1 month ago
That is about what I think also, Other than that I have no ideal.
easttxgranny's profile

about 1 month ago
I think harmony or conflict would be dependent on the attitudes of the people involved. If one of the most important things they are seeking in a romantic partner is that they be involved in their specific form of spiritual or religious life, yes there could be conflict. If that isn't a priority, there would be other friends and acquaintances that could be shared with. I consider myself spiritual and am open to taking what I find of value from many paths. I would not be happy if my partner insisted on me attending religious services regularly. I do enjoy conversing about spiritual ideas together. We don't agree on politics, but we talk about them, which is good.
BarbInBend's profile

about 1 month ago