Message 114 of 1551

healthcare reform-smoke and mirrors

You go to see your doctor, he sends you to a specialist because he is afraid of making a mistake. You end up paying for all these additional tests. If we reformed tort law and lowered the premiums for malpractice insurance, maybe our doctors wouldn't be afraid to make a diagnosis on their own without all the additional specialised tests.
New drugs are prescribed a year or two earlier in America than Europe and they pay 50% more for the same drugs i.e. the rest of the world gets a free ride while America subsidises the cost of R&D for the drug companies.
The central problem is that most Americans get their health insurance through their employers that can buy health insurance with pretax dollars while individuals can't. The doctors get payed for the number of tests they do and the insurance company passes along the cost to the employer in the form of higher premiums, who will pass them along to workers in the form of lower wages. The proportion of the cost of employer provided health care insurance shouldered by employees is almost 100%. Last year, employer provided health insurance reduced wages by 7.9%.i.e the stagnation of middle-class incomes in recent years.
A government plan could wipe out a lot of private insurers since unlike a private insurer, it would not have to make provision for future liability, it could simply stick the bill on future taxpayers. Medicare, has unfunded liabilities of $36 trillion.
Only 4% of American doctors have a fully functional electronic medical-records system, Obama wants to rectify that and alleviate having to redo tests, a step in the right direction.
I usually pride myself on being able to understand economic principles; healthcare was somewhat a mystery to me. I concentrated and wrote down all my thoughts here.
Seems to me we should fix what we already have rather than trying to redesign the whole thing.
tjbr52's profile
Replies 21 - 29 of 29
I'm a fucked up puppy. Anyone want to feed me???? (crying and wiping snot onto my sleeve)
JoyBoy55's profile

5 months ago
As always, jj, you have no reasoning to back up the comments you glean from the minds and publications of others. You simply accuse and curse....what else can you do?

I have offered to debate actual facts but you seem ill equipped to deal with rational discussions.
trippin's profile

5 months ago
LifeLoveLaughter's profile

5 months ago
Comment deleted by an Administrator
Comment deleted by an Administrator
Comment deleted by an Administrator
Comment deleted by an Administrator
Comment deleted by an Administrator
this is how i see the smoking stuff happening
1. democrats vote to have nicotene to be regulated by the FDA.
2 FSA sends out a ruling that all cigaettes have to drop theit nicotene content by 50 per cent
3. the government adds on an additional cigarette tax
4. Now nicotene is a drug to maintain their habit the remaining smokers noe have to smoke twice as many cigarttes
5, the benefits: the cigaret companies profits increase , increase noney in taxes c nohing for the smokers
yichel
yichel's profile

5 months ago
Replies 21 - 29 of 29