I've received several messages of good wishes from friends for the coming celebration of the 4th of July. I appreciate the motivation for those good wishes but I retain a different perspective for the day. I've decided to repost a blog I offered a year ago.
I am particularly drawn to Douglass' line, " America is false to the past, false to the present, and solemnly binds herself to be false to the future." I firmly believe America's future is dim at best without a frank ownership of her past.
Frederick Douglass - July 4, 1852
4th of July Speech
Fellow citizens, pardon me, and allow me to ask, why am I called upon to speak here today? What have I or those I represent to do with your national independence? Are the great principles of political freedom and of natural justice, embodied in that Declaration of Independence, extended to us? And am I, therefore, called upon to bring our humble offering to the national altar, and to confess the benefits, and express devout gratitude for the blessings resulting from your independence to us?
Would to God, both for your sakes and ours, that an affirmative answer could be truthfully returned to these questions. Then would my task be light, and my burden easy and delightful. For who is there so cold that a nation's sympathy could not warm him? Who so obdurate and dead to the claims of gratitude, that would not thankfully acknowledge such priceless benefits? Who so stolid and selfish that would not give his voice to swell the hallelujahs of a nation's jubilee, when the chains of servitude had been torn from his limbs? I am not that man. In a case like that, the dumb might eloquently speak, and the "lame man leap as an hart."
But such is not the state of the case. I say it with a sad sense of disparity between us. I am not included within the pale of this glorious anniversary! Your high independence only reveals the immeasurable distance between us. The blessings in which you this day rejoice are not enjoyed in common. The rich inheritance of justice, liberty, prosperity, and independence bequeathed by your fathers is shared by you, not by me. The sunlight that brought life and healing to you has brought stripes and death to me. This Fourth of July is yours, not mine. You may rejoice, I must mourn. To drag a man in fetters into the grand illuminated temple of liberty, and call upon him to join you in joyous anthems, were inhuman mockery and sacrilegious irony. Do you mean, citizens, to mock me, by asking me to speak today? If so, there is a parallel to your conduct. And let me warn you, that it is dangerous to copy the example of a nation (Babylon) whose crimes, towering up to heaven, were thrown down by the breath of the Almighty, burying that nation in irrecoverable ruin.
Fellow citizens, above your national, tumultuous joy, I hear the mournful wail of millions, whose chains, heavy and grievous yesterday, are today rendered more intolerable by the jubilant shouts that reach them. If I do forget, if I do not remember those bleeding children of sorrow this day, "may my right hand forget her cunning, and may my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth!"
To forget them, to pass lightly over their wrongs and to chime in with the popular theme would be treason most scandalous and shocking, and would make me a reproach before God and the world.
My subject, then, fellow citizens, is "American Slavery." I shall see this day and its popular characteristics from the slave's point of view. Standing here, identified with the American bondman, making his wrongs mine, I do not hesitate to declare, with all my soul, that the character and conduct of this nation never looked blacker to me than on this Fourth of July.
Whether we turn to the declarations of the past, or to the professions of the present, the conduct of the nation seems equally hideous and revolting. America is false to the past, false to the present, and solemnly binds herself to be false to the future. Standing with God and the crushed and bleeding slave on this occasion, I will, in the name of humanity, which is outraged, in the name of liberty, which is fettered, in the name of the Constitution and the Bible, which are disregarded and trampled upon, dare to call in question and to denounce, with all the emphasis I can command, everything that serves to perpetuate slavery -- the great sin and shame of America! "I will not equivocate - I will not excuse." I will use the severest language I can command, and yet not one word shall escape me that any man, whose judgment is not blinded by prejudice, or who is not at heart a slave-holder, shall not confess to be right and just.
But I fancy I hear some of my audience say it is just in this circumstance that you and your brother Abolitionists fail to make a favorable impression on the public mind. Would you argue more and denounce less, would you persuade more and rebuke less, your cause would be much more likely to succeed. But, I submit, where all is plain there is nothing to be argued. What point in the anti-slavery creed would you have me argue? On what branch of the subject do the people of this country need light? Must I undertake to prove that the slave is a man? That point is conceded already. Nobody doubts it. The slave-holders themselves acknowledge it in the enactment of laws for their government. They acknowledge it when they punish disobedience on the part of the slave. There are seventy-two crimes in the State of Virginia, which, if committed by a black man (no matter how ignorant he be), subject him to the punishment of death; while only two of these same crimes will subject a white man to like punishment.
What is this but the acknowledgment that the slave is a moral, intellectual, and responsible being? The manhood of the slave is conceded. It is admitted in the fact that Southern statute books are covered with enactments, forbidding, under severe fines and penalties, the teaching of the slave to read and write. When you can point to any such laws in reference to the beasts of the field, then I may consent to argue the manhood of the slave. When the dogs in your streets, when the fowls of the air, when the cattle on your hills, when the fish of the sea, and the reptiles that crawl, shall be unable to distinguish the slave from a brute, then I will argue with you that the slave is a man!
For the present it is enough to affirm the equal manhood of the Negro race. Is it not astonishing that, while we are plowing, planting, and reaping, using all kinds of mechanical tools, erecting houses, constructing bridges, building ships, working in metals of brass, iron, copper, silver, and gold; that while we are reading, writing, and ciphering, acting as clerks, merchants, and secretaries, having among us lawyers, doctors, ministers, poets, authors, editors, orators, and teachers; that we are engaged in all the enterprises common to other men -- digging gold in California, capturing the whale in the Pacific, feeding sheep and cattle on the hillside, living, moving, acting, thinking, planning, living in families as husbands, wives, and children, and above all, confessing and worshipping the Christian God, and looking hopefully for life and immortality beyond the grave -- we are called upon to prove that we are men?
Would you have me argue that man is entitled to liberty? That he is the rightful owner of his own body? You have already declared it. Must I argue the wrongfulness of slavery? Is that a question for republicans? Is it to be settled by the rules of logic and argumentation, as a matter beset with great difficulty, involving a doubtful application of the principle of justice, hard to understand? How should I look today in the presence of Americans, dividing and subdividing a discourse, to show that men have a natural right to freedom, speaking of it relatively and positively, negatively and affirmatively? To do so would be to make myself ridiculous, and to offer an insult to your understanding. There is not a man beneath the canopy of heaven who does not know that slavery is wrong for him.
What! Am I to argue that it is wrong to make men brutes, to rob them of their liberty, to work them without wages, to keep them ignorant of their relations to their fellow men, to beat them with sticks, to flay their flesh with the lash, to load their limbs with irons, to hunt them with dogs, to sell them at auction, to sunder their families, to knock out their teeth, to burn their flesh, to starve them into obedience and submission to their masters? Must I argue that a system thus marked with blood and stained with pollution is wrong? No - I will not. I have better employment for my time and strength than such arguments would imply.
What, then, remains to be argued? Is it that slavery is not divine; that God did not establish it; that our doctors of divinity are mistaken? There is blasphemy in the thought. That which is inhuman cannot be divine. Who can reason on such a proposition? They that can, may - I cannot. The time for such argument is past.
At a time like this, scorching irony, not convincing argument, is needed. Oh! had I the ability, and could I reach the nation's ear, I would today pour out a fiery stream of biting ridicule, blasting reproach, withering sarcasm, and stern rebuke. For it is not light that is needed, but fire; it is not the gentle shower, but thunder. We need the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake. The feeling of the nation must be quickened; the conscience of the nation must be roused; the propriety of the nation must be startled; the hypocrisy of the nation must be exposed; and its crimes against God and man must be denounced.
What to the American slave is your Fourth of July? I answer, a day that reveals to him more than all other days of the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim. To him your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mock; your prayers and hymns, your sermons and thanksgivings, with all your religious parade and solemnity, are to him mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and hypocrisy - a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages. There is not a nation of the earth guilty of practices more shocking and bloody than are the people of these United States at this very hour.
Go search where you will, roam through all the monarchies and despotisms of the Old World, travel through South America, search out every abuse and when you have found the last, lay your facts by the side of the everyday practices of this nation, and you will say with me that, for revolting barbarity and shameless hypocrisy, America reigns without a rival.
4th of July Speech
posted about 1 month ago
Comments
Log in or sign up to reply.
- 1. about 1 month ago torry49 wrote:
-
Thanks for the posting and the reminder that we do indeed need to examine our history and stop repeating. Seems few are truly listening.
- 2. about 1 month ago amberscribe wrote:
-
Thank you for posting Frederick Douglass's speech. Americans need to be reminded that the Fourth of July is not the same for all of us and why. I, too, wrote a blog about this speech. view link
- 3. about 1 month ago grammyjessy wrote:
-
There are times that I wished I lived elsewhere. Thinking about it, where would I go? Is there a place on this earth where everyone is treated equally? That there isn't high poverty level? That the education, justice, health system isn't broke? That the adolescent pregnancy statistics aren't high? That the divorce rate isn't so high? That the marriage idea of "til do us part" by a natural death after many years of being together- [not spouse inflicted] is a common thing?
Some times when I read and hear the things of what is going on in our country, it appears to me we are going backwards instead of making progress.
We have become a nation that thinks the rest of this world is suppose to be like us. That is wrong! As long as we keep letting "our" government get us into these messes, it will continue to get worse. We can't even take care of our own problems, yet we {our government} think we should take care of the rest of the world's problems.
Question, how do we stop all this? And where should I think about living my last days on this earth, that I can afford?
Thank you okhela for a deep thinking blog.
- 4. about 1 month ago OKScissortail wrote:
-
"and you will say with me that, for revolting barbarity and shameless hypocrisy, America reigns without a rival." Really? You believe that? Do we cut off the hands of thieves? Do we behead women who commit adultery? Do we sell our own daughters to the "sex trade"? I'm not saying that we're close to perfect, but I strongly disagree that we are the most barbaric in our daily practices. As for hypocrisy, well, you can lay that charge at our door. But I believe we are working on becoming more transparent and honest. We are examining the past in order to make a better future. Maybe we are indulging in too many "pity parties" and we just need to go out and change things.
- 5. about 1 month ago torry49 wrote:
-
To move forward, we must embrace the past, the present and the future with open eyes. I don't see much transparency in our government today. Yes, there are worse places to live, but I thought was our goal to be the "best". I was never allowed such excuses growing up. If I really wanted troubled with my parents, all I had to say was, "Everyone else did it." We must hold ourselves to standards that truly meet the morality of God and the universe. We can only do that by examination.
- 6. about 1 month ago OKScissortail wrote:
-
I agree, Torry, that we need to examine. But there is a difference between honest evaluation and accepting an evaluation that says we are the worst, which is the quote I cited from the Douglas speech. I don't believe that most of Douglas' speech is applicable today. Honest evaluation includes noting improvements that have been made.
- 7. about 1 month ago ageingbeautifull wrote:
-
OKScissortail.. I know when I read or hear the speech (hearing it read is so much better) I am moved by the eloquence of Mr, Douglass and the evident passion felt by him...The information contained in the speech could not have been given more powerful meaning -EVER-. I agree that change has occured, more and more American citizens realize a copability and responsibility when it comes to hypocrisy NOW...this has not always been true. Mr. Douglass was highlighting the point in the only means afforded in his time..... I believe when you consider the entire speech and not a part of it you are better served by the contact..It is a beautiful and moving piece...
- 8. about 1 month ago yichel wrote:
-
There are those who might after reading this say “that America is still the best country as they compare it to what ever country they decide on. F. Douglas is asking for something greater to look inward and compare our nationhood to the divine purpose of our country. It was the date of the speech that caught my attention as I began to read it. During 1852 the book Uncle Tom’s cabin was first published and caused an uproar. It was also during that year some of the most stringent “slave laws were passed in non southern states. As in Indiana, 1852: No black or mulatto could settle in the State after the adoption of this state Constitution.
1852: All contracts made with any black or mulatto coming into the State were void. Any person who employed such black, or encouraged him to remain in the State would be fined between $10-$500. Fines collected for a violation of this article were to be appropriated for the colonization of
such blacks and their descendants
1852: Marriages between a white person and a person possessed of one eighth or more of black blood were null and void.
1852: All contracts made with blacks or mulattos who came into the State prior to November 1851 were null and void.
On the other hand I tried to rethink what F. Douglas would include in his speech today 2008.
I figure he would be very proud of the changes yet realizing the need to continue moving forward.
Amen Yichel to all a healthy July fourth.
- 9. about 1 month ago okhela wrote:
-
Yichel, your comment is warmly welcomed.
- 10. about 1 month ago johnH56 wrote:
-
My 6x ggrandfather was at Lexington. He had three sons who also served in the American Revolution. My 5 xggrandfather was at both West Point and Yorktown. We were part of the Shaftsbury Baptist Association that split off from the Southern Baptists over the issue of slavery. The family was part of the underground railroad prior to the civil war. We had over 400 family members serve in the civil war, of whom more than 200 never returned home. And another 50 came home maimed.
This Douglas speech was made over a 100 years ago. And it was eloquent and accurate for that time.
But today I have to ask -is it not time to accept the benefit of the blood, sweat and treasure and good will exerted to improve this country? Rather than criticize is it not time to step up to the plate and do your share to make the place better? In no way, shape or form do I consider this country perfect but I have to ask what are you and all the other current disciples of Mr Douglas doing for your part.
As John Kennedy said so eloquently not so long ago "Ask not what this country can do for you. But what you can do for this country." Isn't the burden on you today to work on the problems instead of whine, my friend.
You can't guilt me, my friend. Instead I will end up discounting anyone not willing to participate in what is available to you today. Hey participation worked for Barack Obama. It worked for Oprah and lots of others, including my stepson.
It is not a question of being Black or too Black that is holding anyone back- imho. I had more than 700 Katrina refugees as tenants for the last 30 odd months, most were Black and poor. Those that had gumption are back on their feet. Those that thought they were victims are still begging and suing those that assisted them in their time of troubles. If as much effort was put into positive efforts as has been put into self destructive behavior, New Orleans would once again be a shining light.
Can we get positive in this discourse? Wallowing in the past of a 100 years ago serves no purpose. If you can't be part of the solution, cna you get out of the way of those that want to move forward..
- 11. about 1 month ago Classylind wrote:
-
Yes it still shows today that we still don't have Independence, like we are suppose to. They haven't even took it upon themseveles to even change the law that was written so long ago. We were not mention in the declaration or thought of for that matter in those times we were still thier slaves but it still stands as it was written all those years ago. I guess because it says all men are created equal but that didn't mean us.They took alot from us and we haven't gotten anything in return like so many other culture groups. that was supposely wronged. still waiting for my land and mule no i want more now. My father God rest his soul he fought in world war 2 and he told me once because he was so light skinned they mistakenly put him with the white soilders well they found out fast he wasn't so he was removed fast as they put him there. so thiers the Black Mans indenpenence for ya. Thanks for sharing this blog.
- 12. about 1 month ago ageingbeautifull wrote:
-
JohnH56....I think the problem is that you associate our recognition and attempts at honoring great American fiqures as somehow the reason for feelings of guilt. I speak for myself here but the thought that an individual White American (or all White Americans) feels guilt for slavery does nothing to abate the consequences or my life circumstance....Are those feelings at all constructive? To my mind they are not, they serve to promote wedges and create barriers (White Americans become defensive and act accordingly)...I do not wish for ANYONE to feel guilty about the racist past of the United States of America. I expect all Americans to recognize its existence and profound ramifications....
Since Crispus Attucks, Africans made American, have been doing for this country. In the light of the racist nature of American society that makes all and everyone of those individuals worthy of honor and recognition.... I read your post and am surprised at your take on New Orleans....The recognition that the port of New Orleans is of value seems more reasonable to me as explanation for the obstacles and impediments to the return of former homeowners to New Orleans.
The Horatio Alger boot straps anology does not apply.....
- 13. about 1 month ago rsb1953 wrote:
-
156 years, and too little has changed.
- 14. about 1 month ago Jazzy147 wrote:
-
Thank you Sam! Isn't it mind blowing that this speech STILL tells it like it is!?