What struck me most was that the women in the tree were inconsequential, despite the fact that they contributed as much to the continuance of the family line. When we marry, we take the names of our husbands and our family history somehow becomes less important. Part of the reason for my search was to see if there was more I might be able to find out about my mother since she is no longer able to share that history with us. I already have a fairly extensive history on my father’s side of my family, but when I think about it, that history is all Gillis and not anything to do with my grandmother. Again, an important part of the story but lost when she accepted his name. Through marriage we somehow lose our identity.
My friend Cali wrote about this as well recently because she has taken her birth name and birthright back, something I applaud. But I wonder how much we know of our mother’s or our grandmother’s side of the family.


posted by CaliforniaBlonde
It is interesting that in our culture, the woman takes the man's surname when they marry. Not all cultures are like that. Not all women get lost in the shuffle. We will just have to keep digging until we find out more, Mary!
Cali
Write in Guestbook
posted by MtnGirl53
Good blog, Mary. It's too bad that women get lost in the shuffle.
Write in Guestbook
posted by SherriAnne
I took my birth name back after 38 years. I also have spent a lot of time doing family research and trying to glean as much as I can on each member of the family. After all, it is the history of us as individuals- comprised of many parts to become a whole. I've had more than one surprise- which makes it all the more interesting. I want my grandchildren to know where they came from, so they have something to rely on, no matter where they are going.
Write in Guestbook
posted by mshadow22
Write in Guestbook